課程資訊
課程名稱
比較威權主義專題
Seminar on Comparative Authoritarianism 
開課學期
107-1 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
潘欣欣 
課號
PS5688 
課程識別碼
322 U2060 
班次
 
學分
2.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期二6,7(13:20~15:10) 
上課地點
社科研604 
備註
比較政治
總人數上限:20人
外系人數限制:3人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1071PS5688_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本課程目的在於介紹分析當代威權主義理論發展,該領域文獻興起於當代威權主義復興與民主化困境。民主政體被盛譽為獨門政治典範(the only game in town),但是21世紀初,全球政治局勢出現逆轉,不但越來越少威權政體民主化,同時某些新興民主國家的民主頻顯鬆動。同時,中、俄等威權政體則是逆勢成長,不斷翻新威權統治技術與民主政體相抗衡。本課程基於學界所發展的比較威權主義文獻,共分為四個部分做介紹。第一部份檢閱民主與非民主政體及威權政體分類的理論。第二部分個別深入介紹威權政體的次類型,包括軍隊、單一政黨、個人、王朝、以及混合式獨裁政體。第三部分處理威權政體的存續、崩潰與轉型。第四部分以威權政體當中的政治行動者為主軸,探討威權政體中的政治行動者之間如何互動。最後以民主衰退的辯戰作為結論。 

課程目標
本課程為研究所選修課程,教學目的主要使研究生能掌握比較威權主義文獻的政體分類、政治改革及轉型理論、議題與研究方法。 
課程要求
參與課堂、期中及期末書面與口頭報告
練習使用中英文期刊書籍網站 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 備註: 歡迎同學與授課老師約談。 地點:社科院819室 電話:02-3366-8319 電郵:phsinhsin@ntu.edu.tw 時間:周三14:00-17:30或另行預約時間。  
指定閱讀
第一部份:政體分類
第2週 9月18日 民主與非民主政體分類
吳玉山,2011,〈宏觀中國:後極權資本主義發展國家-蘇東與東亞模式的揉合〉,《黨國蛻變-中共政權的菁英與政策》,徐斯儉、吳玉山(編),臺北:五南出版社,頁309-320。
Marshall, Monty G., Keith Jaggers, and Ted Robert Gurr. 2011. Polity IV Project Dataset Users’ Manual. College Park: University of Maryland.

第3週 9月25日 威權政體分類
Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 313-331.
Cheibub, José Antonio, Jennifer Gandhi, and James Raymond Vreeland. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143(1-2): 67-101.

第二部份:威權政體種類介紹
第4週 10月2日 軍隊威權政體
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. “Chapter 9: Military Dictatorships in Latin America and Beyond.” In Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Geddes, Barbara, Erica Frantz, and Joseph G. Wright. 2014. “Military Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 147-162.

第5週 10月9日 單一政黨威權政體
徐斯儉,2011,〈「軟紀律約束」改革中共黨國體制的內在限制〉,《黨國蛻變-中共政權的菁英與政策》,徐斯儉、吳玉山(編),臺北市:五南出版社,頁143-176。
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. “Chapter 10: Chapter 10: Single-party Dictatorships in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Beyond.” In Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

第6週 10月16日 個人獨裁政體
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. “Chapter 11: Personalist Dictatorships in Sub-Saharan Africa and Beyond.” In Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Colgan, Jeff D., and Jessica LP Weeks. 2015. “Revolution, Personalist Dictatorships, and International Conflict.” International Organization 69(1): 163-194.
Morgenbesser, Lee. 2018. “Misclassification on the Mekong: The Origins of Hun Sen’s Personalist Dictatorship.” Democratization 25(2): 191-208.

第7週 10月23日 王朝威權政體
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. “Chapter 12: Monarchies in the Middle East and Beyond.” In Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Chambers, Paul, and Napisa Waitoolkiat. 2016. “The Resilience of Monarchised Military in Thailand.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 425-444.

第8週 10月30日 混合式威權政體
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. “Chapter 13: Hybrid Dictatorships.” In Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Wintrobe, Ronald. 2018. “An Economic Theory of A Hybrid (Competitive Authoritarian or Illiberal) Regime.” Public Choice 1-17.

第三部份:威權政體存續、崩潰與轉型
第10週 11月13日 威權政體存續
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 2003. “Chapter 2: The Theory: Definitions and Intuition.” In The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press, 37-76.
Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. “Authoritarian Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14(1): 6-17.
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Adam Przeworski. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279-1301.

第11週 11月20日 威權政體崩潰與轉型
Boix, Carles. 2003. “Chapter 1: A Theory of Political Transitions.” In Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19-64.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?" Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 115-144.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument.” Manuscript.

第四部份:威權政體行動者

第12週 11月 27日 獨裁者
陶儀芬,2011,〈政治權力交替與經濟機會主義:集體行動與改革時期中國政治經濟景氣循環〉,《黨國蛻變-中共政權的菁英與政策》,徐斯儉、吳玉山(編),臺北市:五南出版社,頁177-210。
Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. “Chapter 2: The Dictator’s Dilemma.” In The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 20-42.

第13週 12月4日 獨裁者與菁英關係
寇健文,2010,〈邁向權力核心之路:1987年以後中共文人領袖的政治流動〉,《政治科學論叢》,45:1-36。
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 4(4/5): 715-741.
Boix, Carles, and Milan W. Svolik. 2013. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” The Journal of Politics 75(2): 300-316.

第14週 12月11日 國家與人民關係
Kim, Wonik, and Jennifer Gandhi. 2010. “Coopting Workers Under Dictatorship.” The Journal of Politics 72(3): 646-658.
Lorentzen, Peter L. 2013. “Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8(2): 127-158.
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2013. “Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China.” International Organization 67(1): 1-35.
Owen, Catherine, and Eleanor Bindman. 2017. “Civic Participation in a Hybrid Regime: Limited Pluralism in Policymaking and Delivery in Contemporary Russia.” Government and Opposition 1-23.

第15週 12月18日 民主衰退的辯戰
Diamond, Larry. 2015. “Facing Up to The Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 141-155.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2015. “The Myth of Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 45-58.
Kagan, Robert. “The Weight of Geopolitics.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 21-31.
Schmitter, Philippe C.2015. “Crisis and Transition, But Not Decline.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 32-44. 
參考書目
第一部份:政體分類
第2週 9月18日 民主與非民主政體分類
Puddington, Arch. 2012. “Freedom in the World 2012: The Arab Uprisings and Their Global Repercussions.” In Freedom in the World, 1-40.
Boix, Carles, Michael Miller, and Sebastian Rosato. 2013. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 1523-1554.

第3週 9月25日 威權政體分類
Linz, Juan José. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. “Chapter 3: The Tinpot and Totalitarian.” In The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 43-76.

第二部份:威權政體種類介紹
第4週 10月2日 軍隊威權政體
Cohen, Youssef. 1987. “Democracy from Above: The Political Origins of Military Dictatorship in Brazil.” World Politics 40(1): 30-54.
Crouch, Harold. 1979. “Patrimonialism and Military Rule in Indonesia.” World Politics 31(4): 571-587.

第5週 10月9日 單一政黨威權政體
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Ruth Kricheli. 2010. “Political Order and One-Party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123-143.
Smith, Benjamin. 2005. “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence Under Single-Party Rule.” World Politics 57(3): 421-451.
Malesky, Edmund, Regina Abrami, and Yu Zheng. 2011. “Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China.” Comparative Politics 43(4): 409-427.
Zhang, Yongjing. 2011. “The Successor's Dilemma in China's Single Party Political System.” European Journal of Political Economy 27(4): 674-680.
Greene, Kenneth F. 2010. “The Political Economy of Authoritarian Single-Party Dominance.” Comparative Political Studies 43(7): 807-834.
Malesky, Edmund, and Paul Schuler. 2011. “The Single‐Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(4): 491-530.

第6週 10月16日 個人獨裁政體
Frantz, Erica, and Andrea Kendall-Taylor. 2017. “Pathways to Democratization in Personalist Dictatorships.” Democratization 24(1): 20-40.

第7週 10月23日 王朝威權政體
Milani, Mohsen M. 2018. The Making of Iran's Islamic Revolution: from Monarchy to Islamic Republic. London: Routledge.
De Miguel, Carolina, Amaney A. Jamal, and Mark Tessler. 2015. “Elections in the Arab World: Why do Citizens Turn Out?.” Comparative Political Studies 48(11): 1355-1388.

第8週 10月30日 混合式威權政體
Cheng, Edmund W. 2016. “Street Politics in A Hybrid Regime: The Diffusion of Political Activism in Post-Colonial Hong Kong.” The China Quarterly 226: 383-406.
Bozóki, András, and Dániel Hegedűs. 2018. “An Externally Constrained Hybrid Regime: Hungary in The European Union.” Democratization 1-17.
Adeney, Katharine. 2017. “How to Understand Pakistan's Hybrid Regime: The Importance of A Multidimensional Continuum.” Democratization 24(1): 119-137.

第三部份:威權政體存續、崩潰與轉型
第10週 11月13日 威權政體存續
Jensen, Nathan M., Edmund Malesky, and Stephen Weymouth. 2014. “Unbundling the Relationship Between Authoritarian Legislatures and Political Risk.” British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 655-684.
Wallace, Jeremy. 2013. “Cities, Redistribution, And Authoritarian Regime Survival.” The Journal of Politics 75(3): 632-645.

第11週 11月20日 威權政體崩潰與轉型
Bratton, Michael, and Nicolas Van de Walle. 1994. “Neo-patrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa.” World Politics 46(4): 453-489.

第四部份:威權政體行動者
第12週 11月 27日 獨裁者
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. “Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies.” World Politics 59(4): 595-628.
Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. “Chapter 1: The Problem.” In The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2-19.

第13週 12月4日 獨裁者與菁英關係
Shih, Victor, Christopher Adolph, and Mingxing Liu. 2012. “Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining The Advancement of Central Committee Members in China.” American Political Science Review 106(1): 166-187.
Reuter, Ora John, et al. 2016. “Local Elections in Authoritarian Regimes: An Elite-Based Theory with Evidence from Russian Mayoral Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 49(5): 662-697.

第14週 12月11日 國家與人民關係
Breuer, Anita, Todd Landman, and Dorothea Farquhar. 2015. “Social Media and Protest Mobilization: Evidence from The Tunisian Revolution.” Democratization 22(4): 764-792.

第15週 12月18日 民主衰退的辯戰
Cooley, Alexander. 2015. “Countering Democratic Norms.” Journal of Democracy 26(3): 49-63.
Plattner, Marc F. 2015. “Is Democracy in Decline?.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 5-10. 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
09/11  課程介紹 
第2週
9/18  民主與非民主政體分類 
第3週
9/25  威權政體分類 
第4週
10/02  軍隊威權政體 
第5週
10/09  單一政黨威權政體 
第6週
10/16  個人獨裁政體  
第7週
10/23  王朝威權政體 
第8週
10/30  混合式威權政體 
第9週
11/06  期中報告 
第10週
11/13  期中報告 
第11週
11/20  期中報告 
第12週
11/27  獨裁者與菁英關係 
第13週
12/4  國家與人民關係 
第14週
12/11  威權存續 
第15週
12/18  威權政體崩潰、轉型與民主衰退 
第16週
12/25  期末報告 
第17週
1/01  元旦放假 
第18週
01/08  期末報告